It is not WASTE that is being considered for Plainfield, it is the supplying of TRACK BALLAST for NJT's operations.
Track ballast support rails and ties, drains away moisture. |
The rail spur which serves the quarry will be out of commission during the overpass construction, which has been quoted in the newspapers (see here and here) as being expected to take two years.
The need for the track ballast will not be abated, so the stone will have to be shipped via another means.
Hence the dump trucks, hence Plainfield.
The likely staging area for the track ballast would be adjacent to the Reinco building (upper center). |
Wear and tear on the streets. Increased risk of pedestrian danger. Noise.
Would a siding have to be constructed adjacent to the Reinco lot? How would the trucks gain access? What construction and equipment would be required to get the stone from the trucks to the rail cars? Would an enormous pile of ballast be built up there? Would everything be restored to the status quo ante after the Route 22 project is finished?
And the large question remains: Is Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs party to discussions on using the Plainfield site to store and transfer the track ballast on a large scale, or is she out of the loop.
- Plainfield Today: "Plainfield as waste storage site: Mayor in on the deal or out of the loop?"
- Wikipedia: "Track Ballast"
- American Rails: "Ballast, supporting the rails and ties"
-- Dan Damon [follow]
4 comments:
Am I missing something here (like perhaps the sources for your ruminations)? Why would they schlep this all to Plainfield when they have access to the same rail line in Bound Brook, within about a mile from the construction site?
Is the purpose of the post just to gratuitously poke the mayor for poking's sake? If you've got some basis for all this, then I suggest you spell it out with the who, what and where. It sounds pretty nonsensical to me.
I hope that the City will negotiate a good deal regarding this issue, on behalf of the tax payers.
There are many residents who will be inconvenienced (i.e. quality of life) not to mention the wear and tear on the streets. This is an opportunity for the City to make a few extra dollars if they play their cards right, through permits, fees, etc.
I hope they know what they're doing.
Hey, Plainfield people, let's think as first class people. This will do nothing to further Plainfield - it will be dusty, dirty, in the summer think about having dump trucks around the city - why do you want this???
We deserve better, we are better - dump in Westfield - Cranford - Clark - you get the picture. Why us again???? Aren't we better than that? I am.
Alan -- You exactly got the point. Why WOULD they schlep this stuff to Plainfield?
Is it really possible there is no other siding along the entirely Raritan Valley Line that would do?
Or is it that Plainfield is considered 'just fine enough' for the dirty work?
Post a Comment