Delivered to 15,000 Plainfield "doorsteps" Monday, Wednesday, Friday & Sunday

Thursday, February 5, 2009

A flummoxing message from Plainfield's mayor



Transcribed below is the press release from Plainfield Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs concerning her advocacy of the pension deferral plan currently being discussed. (It is also available as a PDF file on the city's website here.)

I am posting it in its entirety,
EXACTLY AS PUBLISHED, as I find it flummoxing.

It seems to have been posted to the website
AFTER her verbal presentation to the Council on February 2.
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION AND PUBLICATION

Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs supports pension deferral strategy

Plainfield, NJ: February 2, 2009

After participating last week on a conference call with representatives of Governor Corzine's state financial team and various Mayors from New Jersey, and after discussing this with her City Administrator Marc Dashield and Corporation Counsel Daniel Williamson, the Mayor has renewed her recommendation tonight to the Plainfield City Council for the City of Plainfield and strongly urged them to participate in the Governor's Proposal for temporary deferral of local pension contributions as a means of helping Plainfield maintain the 4% tax levy.

Per Mayor Robinson-Briggs, "this appears to be the only available viable solution to an economic situation which currently exists in the City of Plainfield, Union County and the State of New Jersey." This deferral proposal would ease the property tax burden right now and allow more residents to be able to afford home ownership. This would also help our City avoid raising taxes to an unbearable high level. It will help us to avoid any critical cuts which could result in sacrifices to our public safety and public health.

Per Governor Corzine's proposal, this proposal helps to support service delivery, control property tax levies and minimize the impact on the pension system while providing an alternative investment option for those communities that have a less severe tax issue.

Mayor Robinson-Briggs further indicated that "this proposal also has the support of Fanwood Mayor Colleen Mahr, other Mayors statewide and that Assemblyman Jerry Green is in discussions with other State Legislators about this proposed legislation."

"Although my administration and I realize that our budget belongs to our City Council, we are respectfully requesting that they take a good look at this proposal which could be a savings for our taxpayers, particularly at a time when it is needed the most. My administration and I are very happy to introduce this proactive initiative to the Council. I am requesting City Council Members to spend time reviewing this concept which could actually save significant tax payer dollars, keep more people in their homes and assist with balancing our budget to the 4% tax levy or possibly lower."

In the interim, a document will be provided to the City Council and community at the next City Council meeting to address any questions. Additionally, a Community Forum has been scheduled for February 25, 2009 6:30pm, Washington Community School, Darrow Avenue, Plainfield, New Jersey. The community will be fully apprised about this proposal and recommendation.

END
Some of the assertions are just plain puzzling --
  • What does it mean to 'maintain the 4% tax levy'? The state does have a 4% ANNUAL CAP ON SPENDING INCREASES. Is this what the Mayor means?

  • How will this deferral help 'avoid raising taxes to an unbearable high level'? Especially if there will be NO Extraordinary Aid. Would the pension payment deferral more than make up for the missing aid? By how much?

  • Is stating that 'our budget belongs to our City Council' a way of ducking the Administration's responsibility to make a good-faith budget proposal that addresses the fiscal situation with all the inside knowledge the Administration has? After all, while it is true that the Council must STRIKE THE BUDGET, it is also true that it cannot -- even with diligent probing -- know as much about the situation on the ground as the Administration is supposed to. A cop-out?

  • As for the Community Forum on February 25, maybe someone should tell the person who updates the online calendar -- the forum was not included as of late Wednesday evening --


  • Lastly, Mayor Robinson-Briggs promises that the Council -- and the public -- will be supplied at the next Council meeting (February 9) the information necessary to answer any questions.
Would be nice if were posted on the City's website, too.

It could be right next to the Spanish version of the Mayor's State of the City Address which she promised (in her speech) would be available on the website 'later in the month'.

Oops!

I forget -- the State of the City Address is not yet online, in Spanish or English.

Oh, well.



-- Dan Damon

View today's CLIPS here. Not getting your own CLIPS email daily? Click here to subscribe.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

How about the mayor having only 1 assistant instead of 3?

How about letting non proftis take over Drake House - Dudley House - Bilingual day care - Healthy Moms/Healthy babies programs?

How about the administration making some good decisions about who they hire?

How about voting for someone other than the mayor in November. I know Adrian Mapp may not be a great choice for people, but would they rather have another 4 years of Jerry Green?

olddoc said...

Dan, Regarding the city calender for Feb. On Feb 2 AM it was blank. Although I was prevented from commenting on that fact at the Council meeting afterward I did express my displeasure to the Council President. Lo and behold on the 3rd it appeared to be filled. The location of the Feb 6 meeting is still not posted.

Keep up your expose of the idiosyncracies in Plainfield's finances.

olddoc said...

Dan, what ever was the result of any investigation of the QuadTech fiasco.Was it ignored or swept under the cracks? Certainly your 1/31/07 posting should have caught some watchdog's eye.

Rob said...

The Mayor would never have the stones and neither would Jerry...yeah, I know I should have saved myself the time and simply typed Mayor Jerry...to actually REALISTICALLY CUT EMPLOYEES to save costs. The Mayor with 1 assistant??? PLEASE...look how little gets done and out on time with 3...that office would seize up faster than an engine without oil on a hot summer day on the Parkway.

Anonymous said...

If memory serves me correctly, there was a time, and not that many years ago that there was only one secretary that served both the Mayor and City Administrator.