![]() |
The city's domain name (highlighted in yellow) is as much as asset as a snow plow or a fire truck. |
Checking Plainfield's official website (see here) before going to bed Sunday evening, I was startled to find a 'website not found' error notice.
If you recall, I wrote in December (see here) that an issue had come to light when a Transition Team volunteer uncovered the fact that the plainfield.com domain name was set to expire at the end of 2013.
I pointed out that the plainfield .com domain was a valuable asset, and hoped that someone would address the issue before the registration expired as Mayor-elect Mapp had no authority to order an action to be taken.
I was roundly criticized by a member of the Transition Team for being unprofessional, for which I apologized to that person and to Mayor-elect Mapp.
The overnight 'disappearance' of the City's official website appears more likely to have been a short downtime for maintenance, as the site was up and working Monday morning.
However the incident led me to check the 'Whois' database, which lists detailed information about the site and its ownership. You can view that information here.
There I found that on December 11, 2013, the day after my original post, the site's registration had been renewed until January 11, 2015 and the ownership information indicated an unnamed entity in Drums, PA, a small community in the Poconos.
As I pointed out in December, the domain name is an asset, just as much as a snow plow or a fire truck --
...owning both domain names [.con and .gov] gives the City of Plainfield the flexibility to allow the use of the .com domain for a separate purpose (or purposes) from the city government website -- say as window on economic development activity and opportunities, or to promote Plainfield cultural organizations and activities or tourism or as an online marketplace for Plainfield businesses. The possibilities are limited only by our imaginations ... AND OWNING the domain name.If the ownership has truly been taken away from the City of Plainfield, a question arises whether City staff have a 'duty of care' with regard to the preservation of the ownership of the domain name and have thus been negligent.
Such negligence, if that is the case, could have serious consequences.



















