Conditional developer resolution was on Monday's agenda. |
Though 30 of Monday night's 31 Council resolutions passed unanimously on voice votes with hardly any comment, the one that caused a division
among the Council made me think for a moment that we were in the midst
of a political campaign. Two of the 11 ordinances up for first reading
also got split votes.
The three items that caused comment were the ordinances creating a Manager, Motors position (2017-22) and a salary band for the position (2017-23), plus a resolution (284-17) authorizing a conditional redeveloper agreement for the Muhlenberg campus project.
Councilor took advantage of the occasions to showboat. She protested -- as she has several times before -- the creation of the position to manage the city's vehicle fleet (which numbers more than 250 vehicles).
Ditto amending the salary ordinance to include a salary band for the new position.
Her approach on the Muhlenberg campus plan was more pro forma. Once Deputy City Administrator for Economic Development Carlos Sanchez assured her the apartments mentioned would be market-rate, Rivers mellowed.
He explained the conditional agreement would give the developer and JFK 120 days to hammer out a final agreement, during which no other developer could make an approach to the project.
Rivers and her faithful minion, Councilor Toliver, voted "no" on the three items -- the only dissent in the whole evening.
Meanwhile, no one commented on the really troublesome resolution (R 273-17) which authorized adjustments in taxes of nearly $305,000 downward owing to tax board judgments. Not only are those taxes adjusted for the current year, the reduction stays in place going forward.
Sooner or later this issue will have to be addressed. The state is watching local communities that have not done revaluations in a long time. Plainfield's number will be coming up -- a prospect no one welcomes.
The three items that caused comment were the ordinances creating a Manager, Motors position (2017-22) and a salary band for the position (2017-23), plus a resolution (284-17) authorizing a conditional redeveloper agreement for the Muhlenberg campus project.
Councilor took advantage of the occasions to showboat. She protested -- as she has several times before -- the creation of the position to manage the city's vehicle fleet (which numbers more than 250 vehicles).
Ditto amending the salary ordinance to include a salary band for the new position.
Her approach on the Muhlenberg campus plan was more pro forma. Once Deputy City Administrator for Economic Development Carlos Sanchez assured her the apartments mentioned would be market-rate, Rivers mellowed.
He explained the conditional agreement would give the developer and JFK 120 days to hammer out a final agreement, during which no other developer could make an approach to the project.
Rivers and her faithful minion, Councilor Toliver, voted "no" on the three items -- the only dissent in the whole evening.
Meanwhile, no one commented on the really troublesome resolution (R 273-17) which authorized adjustments in taxes of nearly $305,000 downward owing to tax board judgments. Not only are those taxes adjusted for the current year, the reduction stays in place going forward.
Sooner or later this issue will have to be addressed. The state is watching local communities that have not done revaluations in a long time. Plainfield's number will be coming up -- a prospect no one welcomes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment